Model of Socialism M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky # 003Tugan-Baranovsky entered the history of world economic thought, in particular, as the author of one of the first attempts to synthesize traditionally rival theories - labor cost and marginal utility. On this occasion, as far back as the 90s of the last century, a heated debate broke out in the Russian periodical press between the “critics” of K. Marx and the “Orthodox”. The nature of the arguments of the latter can be judged to some extent by the recently reprinted article of V. Bukharin “Theoretical reconciliation.
However, in our opinion, the significance of the “conciliatory” concept, which consists in explaining the process of correlation of costs and results in social production, a process that occurs spontaneously under capitalism and is the essence of national economic planning under socialism, remains incomprehensible to Bukharin. Having looked at this dispute from the standpoint of the modern theory of the optimal functioning of the socialist economy, one will have to admit the correctness of the Tuvan-Baranovsky arevisionist.
A few words about the attitude of Tugan-Baranovsky to Marxism. It is characteristic that the scientist himself did not at all claim the title of Marxist. Indeed, he only did what he encroached on the “foundations”, on various elements of the paradigm of the prevailing current in Marxism: on the concept of historical materialism; on the labor theory of value (value); to the justification of the inevitability of socialism by referring to the impending crisis of capitalism, etc. However, many of its innovations today no longer seem seditious to us, but seem more like normal development and even restoration of the original humanistic tradition of Marxism.
In the first half of the 1990s, a peculiar anniversary can be celebrated - one hundred years from the beginning of the formation of revisionism as a special trend.
Isn’t it time to think about why already at the turn of our century, many independent thinkers who recognized the predominant influence of K. Marx on their views, at the same time did not want to be called Marxists? Was it then that the identification of Marxism with dogmatism, so characteristic of modern mass consciousness, took place with the assumption of the obligation "not to abandon principles"?
Voluntary dissociation from "hard Marxism" of those who, like M. I. Tugan-Baranovsky, from K. Marx wanted to go "forward, to create a new theory of socialism", sweeping their enrollment in the camp of bourgeois economists, and then forgetting their heritage - these are some stages of dogmatization of the main channel of Marxist political economy, the channel of Marxism-Leninism. Everyone who is looking for a video chat with girls, has a desire to communicate with them, and not on the most decent topics. This site gathers people from all over the world, and they all have only one thing in common, it cams girls and also intimate communication. Video chat without registration allows its users to use all the functionality of the system. Sex video chat is a pleasure for real men. Free registration gives you the opportunity to communicate with the most charming slutty girls.